ChessPivot
A chess board with a chess piece

Post-mortem analysis

General

Photo : Fotis Nakos
General

Post-mortem analysis is the critical review of a chess game carried out after it has ended, with the goal of identifying mistakes, missed opportunities, and key turning points.

The process involves replaying the moves — either on a board or with software — and comparing the decisions made to stronger alternatives. The focus is on finding the critical moments where the game could have taken a different course. For instance, if a player missed a winning fork on move 20, post-mortem analysis helps pinpoint that tactical pattern and understand why it went unnoticed during the game.

In practice, players rated 800–1400 are strongly encouraged to analyse their games using an engine such as Stockfish, available on most online platforms — but not to rely on it blindly. The recommended approach is to first identify the key moments independently, then check those conclusions against the engine. This method builds self-evaluation skills, which are one of the cornerstones of chess improvement.

How to exploit it — and defend against it

To get the most out of post-mortem analysis, focus on the moments where you felt uncertain during the game rather than replaying every move mechanically. Take note of the tactical patterns you missed — forks, pins, skewers — so you can spot them more readily in future games. Compare your own assessment of key positions to the engine’s evaluation: frequent disagreements point to specific weaknesses worth addressing. Keep each session to two or three games at most to stay focused and genuinely absorb the lessons.

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

How long should post-mortem analysis of a chess game take?
Fifteen to thirty minutes is usually enough for a thorough review of a single game. What matters is depth, not duration: understanding two or three key moments properly is more valuable than skimming through every move.
Should you use an engine for post-mortem analysis?
An engine is a useful tool but should not replace your own thinking. Analyse the game yourself first, then verify with the engine — this approach is far more instructive than simply following the computer’s arrows and evaluations.
What is the difference between post-mortem analysis and opening preparation?
Post-mortem analysis reviews a game already played in order to correct past mistakes, while opening preparation involves studying theoretical lines before sitting down to play. Both are complementary parts of a well-rounded improvement plan.

From the blog

Analyze your games for free

Spot your recurring mistakes and turn them into progress with ChessPivot.

Analyze my games