Scotch Game - 1. e4
Scotch Game - 1. e4
Classic first central move.
Overview
The Scotch Game (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4, ECO C44 to C45) is the most direct of the great open openings: as early as move three, White provokes the central crisis and forces Black to commit. Its name comes from a famous correspondence match between Edinburgh and London (1824), won by the Scots thanks to this opening — though the analysis goes back further, to the Italian theoretician Ercole del Rio in the 18th century. Long overshadowed by the Ruy Lopez, it was spectacularly revived by Kasparov, who used it in world championship matches in the 1990s; it has been part of the elite arsenal ever since.
The logic of 3.d4 is crystal clear: after 3…exd4 4.Nxd4, the centre is open, the white knight sits proudly on d4 and both sides must play with pieces rather than pawn chains. Unlike the Spanish with its long manoeuvring battles, the Scotch simplifies preparation: Black has only two serious main replies — 4…Bc5 (the classical, attacking the d4-knight) and 4…Nf6 (attacking e4) — and White chooses the character of the fight.
The main line of this guide illustrates the variation with 4…Nf6 5.Nc3 Bb4: after 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.Bd3 d5, the position opens completely and leads to structures rich in piece play — crossed pins (Bg5 against …Bb4), open central files, and Black’s c6-d5 pawn duo, which can become a strength or a weakness depending on what follows. The opening also has gambit cousins: the Scotch Gambit 4.Bc4 and the Göring Gambit 4.c3, which sacrifice a pawn for the initiative.
Who is the Scotch for? Direct players who like the initiative, lively positions and concrete decisions — and anyone who wants to play 1.e4 e5 as White without absorbing the theoretical ocean of the Ruy Lopez. It teaches precious skills: piece play in open positions, handling an accelerated development race, and the art of converting a tempo into lasting pressure.
The main line, move by move
Every move is explained: play through them in order to understand the opening’s logic.
- 1. e4Classic first central move.
- 1… e5Symmetrical response.
- 2. Nf3Development attacking the pawn.
- 2… Nc6Natural defence.
- 3. d4Core idea of the Scotch: open the centre.
- 3… exd4Black captures.
- 4. Nxd4Centralised knight.
- 4… Nf6Active development.
- 5. Nc3Defends e4.
- 5… Bb4Pins the c3 knight.
- 6. Nxc6Eliminates the defending knight.
- 6… bxc6Pawn recapture.
- 7. Bd3Classical development.
- 7… d5Freeing central move.
- 8. exd5Exchange in the centre.
- 8… cxd5Recapture.
- 9. O-OSecures the king.
- 9… O-OBlack castles.
- 10. Bg5Pins the f6 knight.
- 10… c6Reinforces d5.
- 11. Qf3Pressure on f6 and d5.
- 11… Be7Bishop retreat.
- 12. Rae1Activates the rook.
- 12… Re8Active rook.
- 13. Bxf6Tactical exchange.
- 13… Bxf6Recapture with the bishop.
Plans for both sides
White’s plan
White’s capital in the Scotch is a tempo of development and momentary control of the centre: the whole plan consists of making it pay before Black equalises. First priority: coordination. The d4-knight must decide its future early — the Nxc6 exchange gives Black the c6-d5 pawn duo but speeds up White’s play and fixes targets; it only makes sense when followed by a concrete plan against that centre. In the main-line structure (after 7.Bd3 d5 8.exd5 cxd5), the white pieces converge on the kingside: Bg5 pins the f6-knight, the queen comes to f3 to press on both f6 and d5, and the rooks take the open central files — the e-file first, where every minor-piece exchange brings the game closer to an endgame in which the isolated d5-pawn becomes a black burden. The seemingly innocent Bxf6 exchange is often the right tactical moment: it removes the black king’s best defender and leaves the white queen ruling the light squares. The prophylactic h3 deserves a mention: it takes the g4-square away from the black bishop and prevents annoying pins before any operation is launched. Likewise, against the …Bb4 pin, White should not fear the doubled pawns after bxc3: the bishop pair and the half-open b-file more than compensate. Against the classical 4…Bc5, the plan changes: Be3 and c3 consolidate the d4-knight, then White chooses between quiet development (Bc4 or Be2, castling) and the ambitious e5 push after preparation. In every case the Scotch golden rule is the same: each move must either develop or create a threat — the initiative is the only dividend of the early 3.d4, and it melts away if you play by routine.
Black’s plan
Black’s play in the Scotch rests on a reassuring observation: if the opening of the centre is survived for the first ten moves, the position is fundamentally sound and chances balance out. The first strategic choice comes on move four. 4…Bc5 bets on pressure against d4 and fast development — with the typical idea of …Qf6 and …Nge7, reinforcing the pressure while preparing to castle. 4…Nf6 attacks e4 and accepts more unbalanced structures, such as the c6-d5 duo of the main line. In that very structure, the d5-pawn is the backbone of Black’s game: it restrains the d3-bishop, controls e4 and c4, and can become a passed pawn of great value in the endgame. Black’s entire strategy consists of keeping it defended (…c6, …Be6) while activating the pieces: rooks on the e-file, the dark-squared bishop towards f6 where it eyes d4 and White’s queenside after the exchange on f6. Defensive vigilance focuses on two precise motifs. First the Bg5 + Qf3 battery: it prepares sacrifices on f6 or d5, and the counter …c6 followed by the …Be7 retreat (as in the main line) is the proven antidote. Second the Nd5 jump: as long as a white knight can land on d5 with effect, Black must keep that square under control — that is the lesson of the "Scotch Legal’s mate" trap in this guide. In the longer term, Black has two levers: …c5 (while the c-pawn is still on c6 or c7) to free the game and fix d4, and methodical simplification towards an endgame where the potential passed d5-pawn works all by itself. The general recipe: complete development first, tactical accounts settled second, and only then the positional harvest.
Main variations
Scotch Game: Classical Variation
ECO C45Black plays Bc5 to attack the d4 knight.
Italian Game: Classical Variation, Greco Gambit, Moeller-Therkatz Attack
ECO C44Instead of recapturing, White plays Bc4 and offers a pawn.
Scotch Game: Lolli Variation
ECO C44Frequent line: the 4…Nxd4 reply (~34% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game: Scotch Gambit (4.Bc4, 4…d6)
ECO C44Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 4…d6 reply (~14% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 4…Bb4+
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 4…Bb4+ reply (~8% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 4…Be7
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 4…Be7 reply (~9% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit, Max Lange Attack
ECO C56Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 4…Nf6 reply (~26% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game: Scotch Gambit (4.Bc4, 4…h6)
ECO C44Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 4…h6 reply (~14% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 5…Bb6
ECO C45Frequent line: 4…Bc5, the 5…Bb6 reply (~16% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 5…Bxd4
ECO C45Frequent line: 4…Bc5, the 5…Bxd4 reply (~9% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game: Schmidt Variation
ECO C45Frequent line: the 5…Nxd4 reply (~26% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 5…Nxd4
ECO C45Frequent line: 4…Bc5, the 5…Nxd4 reply (~14% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game: Haxo Gambit
ECO C44Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 5…dxc3 reply (~48% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 5…d3
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 5…d3 reply (~8% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 5…d6
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 5…d6 reply (~12% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 5…Bc5
ECO C45Frequent line: the 5…Bc5 reply (~20% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 5.Nb3
ECO C45Another system for the player: 5.Nb3. Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 6…Bxc3+
ECO C45Frequent line: the 6…Bxc3+ reply (~10% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 6…d6
ECO C45Frequent line: 4…Bc5, the 6…d6 reply (~10% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 7…Bxc3+
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 7…Bxc3+ reply (~10% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 7…d6
ECO C45Frequent line: 4…Bc5, the 7…d6 reply (~18% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 7…O-O
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 7…O-O reply (~14% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 7…O-O
ECO C45Frequent line: 4…Bc5, the 7…O-O reply (~42% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 7…O-O
ECO C45Frequent line: the 7…O-O reply (~39% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 8…Nxc3
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 8…Nxc3 reply (~37% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 8…O-O
ECO C45Frequent line: the 8…O-O reply (~15% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 9…Ne5
ECO C45Frequent line: 4.Bc4, the 9…Ne5 reply (~23% at peer level). Engine-verified continuation.
Typical pawn structures
Symmetrical Isolated Pawn Structure (IQP on d4 vs d5)
This structure is defined by two symmetrical isolated pawns, White’s on d4 and Black’s on d5, each lacking a neighbouring pawn on the c- and e-files for support. These isolated pawns are both a strength, controlling important central squares and offering outpost squares at c5 for Black and c4 or e4 for White, and a weakness, since they can be blockaded and targeted. The square e4 is especially critical: if White places a knight there, the isolated d4 pawn becomes much harder for Black to attack. White’s strategy is to keep the d4 pawn dynamic rather than passive, activating all pieces and avoiding unnecessary exchanges that would simplify into an endgame where the pawn becomes a liability. The central push d4-d5 is an aggressive option that can generate a direct attack if Black is unprepared. The bishop pair, with pieces on d3 and an active bishop on c1 or f4, can be very powerful in this open type of position. Black’s plan is to blockade the isolated d4 pawn by routing a knight to d5, typically via f6-d5 or by exchanging on d4 after c6-d4, making the pawn a long-term static weakness. Favourable exchanges simplify the position and highlight the structural defect. The active bishop on f5 adds extra pressure on White’s pawn chain and limits White’s piece activity.
Backward c6-pawn structure (after the f6 exchange)
In this structure, the pawn on c6 is backward on the half-open d-file, unable to be supported by any neighbouring pawn and cut off from advancing to c5. This backward c6 pawn is a lasting structural weakness that White will exploit by doubling rooks on the d-file. The absence of the knight on f6, replaced here by the bishop on f6, deprives Black of an active defender and leaves the square e5 available for White’s pieces. White organises play around the pressure on c6: the queen on d1, a rook on d1 after castling, and a potential knight on d4 all aim to fix and attack this pawn. The square d6 can become a powerful outpost for a White piece if the d5 pawn is exchanged away. A typical and effective manoeuvre is routing a knight to e5 and then d7, attacking the backward pawn from behind. Black’s main freeing idea is to push c6-c5, even at the cost of weakening d5, in order to activate the bishop on f6 and gain more space. Alternatively, Black can try to exchange off the major pieces to reduce pressure and aim for an endgame where the backward pawn is less of a liability. Active piece play, particularly using the bishop on f6 to influence the centre, is Black’s primary resource to compensate for the structural weakness.
Common mistakes
Not capturing on d4. After 3.d4, the capture 3…exd4 is practically forced. Maintaining the tension with 3…d6?! allows 4.dxe5 dxe5 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 — and Black has lost castling rights for nothing. As for 3…Nxd4?!, the exchange helps White: 4.Nxd4 exd4 5.Qxd4 plants the queen in the centre WITHOUT Black being able to chase it with a knight move — the c6-knight, which would have gained that tempo, is gone. That is the whole paradox: the same queen recapture, bad for White on move four, becomes good once the black knight has been traded.
Recapturing on d4 with the queen. Symmetrically, after 3…exd4 the recapture 4.Qxd4?! (a transposition in the spirit of the Centre Game) hands over a free tempo: the c6-knight attacks the queen, which must move again. White loses no material, but squanders exactly the development lead that 3.d4 was supposed to provide. The correct recapture is 4.Nxd4 — the centralised knight is the hero of the opening.
Hunting the e4-pawn with the queen. The Steinitz Variation trap in this guide shows it: after 4…Qh4?! eyeing e4, White answers 5.Nc3!, and if Black grabs the pawn (5…Bb4 6.Be2 Qxe4), the move 7.Ndb5! creates the double threats Nc7+ and Nd6+ — Black must give up castling with …Kd8 and suffer a crushing initiative. Bringing the queen out before the minor pieces to snatch a central pawn is the anti-model of open-game play.
Exchanging Nxc6 without a plan. On the white side, the Nxc6 bxc6 exchange is neither good nor bad in itself: it gives Black a solid central pawn duo AND half-open files. Played by routine, without an energetic follow-up (the fast Bd3/O-O development of the main line, or the e5 push of the Mieses Variation), it merely strengthens the opponent’s centre. Practical rule: only capture on c6 if you already know what concrete use you will make of the tempo gained.
Developing the bishop to g4 on autopilot. On the black side, the "natural" …Bg4 development without precise calculation is regularly punished in the Scotch: as the dedicated trap in this guide shows, the Nd5! jump followed by the exchanges leaves White with the bishop pair, a supported passed pawn on d5 and clear positional domination. Before any pin on f3, check two things: that the c3-knight cannot jump to d5 with effect, and that the recapture on f3 does not open attacking lines against your own king.
Frequently asked questions
Why is the opening called the "Scotch Game"?
It owes its name to a correspondence match between the Edinburgh and London clubs, started in 1824. The Scots adopted 3.d4 — which the Londoners had in fact introduced to them — and won the match, forever attaching their name to the opening. The idea itself is older: the Italian theoretician Ercole del Rio analysed it as early as the 18th century. After a long spell in the wilderness (the Ruy Lopez dominated the classical scene), the Scotch returned to the summit thanks to Kasparov, who made it a world championship match weapon in the 1990s.
Is the Scotch good for beginners?
Excellent, for a precise reason: it applies opening principles in the most readable way possible. The centre opens on move three, every tempo counts, and you learn very quickly why "develop with a threat" and "don’t bring the queen out too early" are golden rules — the traps in this guide are so many demonstrations of it. It requires less theory than the Italian or the Spanish and produces positions where the better developer wins. One caveat: open positions punish slow moves immediately, so you must accept doing a little calculation right from the opening.
How should Black meet the Scotch?
After 3…exd4 4.Nxd4 (the capture is all but forced), two main replies share the theory. 4…Bc5 attacks the d4-knight and leads to active piece play: after 5.Be3 Qf6 6.c3 Nge7, Black completes development while keeping the pressure. 4…Nf6 attacks e4 and leads either to this guide’s main line (5.Nc3) or to the sharper Mieses Variation 5.Nxc6 bxc6 6.e5, where the knight reroutes via d5 after …Qe7. Both are sound; the essential thing is to avoid the known pitfalls: don’t hunt e4 with the queen (4…Qh4?!), and don’t play …Bg4 on autopilot.
What is the difference between the Scotch Game and the Scotch Gambit?
In the Scotch Game proper, White recaptures the pawn: 3…exd4 4.Nxd4, and material stays balanced. In the Scotch Gambit, White leaves the d4-pawn hanging and plays 4.Bc4: ultra-fast development and the aim at f7 compensate for the pawn. The cousin Göring Gambit goes even further with 4.c3, offering a second pawn to open every line. The gambits are excellent practical weapons in faster time controls, but the "clean" Scotch is the most reliable choice: it delivers the same open, active positions without any material investment, and remains playable at the very highest level.
Results by rating level
Most-played lines (1600–1799 level)
- Central capture exd4exd483%52% wins (White)
- Defense …d6d66%55% wins (White)
- Knight development Nf6Nf63%56% wins (White)
- Lolli VariationNxd42%56% wins (White)
- Bd61%54% wins (White)
- Central counter …d5d51%55% wins (White)
The percentage shows the move’s popularity (share of games that play it). White’s score stays near 50% because all of these lines are sound — popularity is what sets them apart.
Position explorer
Three databases, each one named: masters, online players in your ELO band, and you.
Rated Lichess games in blitz and rapid, ELO band 1600–1799.
Moves played: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4
Evaluating…No game on record at this position.
Reference games
Step through each game at your own pace with the arrows — it opens at the end of the opening.
Caruana, F.. (2820) — Aronian, L.. (2781)Draw · 2021
Fabiano Caruana, the American world number two whose calculating precision is often likened to a computer, meets Levon Aronian in a matchup that carries all the hallmarks of a great rivalry. The Scotch Game — revived by Kasparov in the 1990s and later adopted by Carlsen — is Caruana’s weapon of choice here, seeking a direct opening edge from move one. A compelling clash between the technician and the artist.
Analyse this game →Nakamura, Hi (2786) — Carlsen, M. (2832)Black wins (resignation, time or agreement) · 2018
Hikaru Nakamura — 'Naka' — one of the most feared blitz players on the planet and a long-standing rival of Carlsen both over the board and, famously, on social media, puts Magnus to the test with the Scotch Game, an aggressive choice designed to shake up classical theory early. Carlsen, playing Black, must defuse a sharp position from the very first moves. An electric encounter between two champions who absolutely hate losing — especially to each other.
Analyse this game →Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) — Kramnik, V. (2808)Black wins (resignation, time or agreement) · 2017
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, known as "MVL", is one of the world’s foremost Najdorf experts and a fearsome attacking force at the elite level. Across the board, Vladimir Kramnik — World Champion from 2000 to 2007 — is a master of positional chess who turned strategic precision into an art form. This 2017 encounter in the Scotch Game pits two radically different chess philosophies against each other: French firepower versus Russian cold-blooded technique.
Analyse this game →So, W. (2810) — Carlsen, M. (2822)Black wins (resignation, time or agreement) · 2017
Wesley So, renowned for his near-mechanical precision and rock-solid style, faces World Champion Magnus Carlsen — the all-time ELO record holder (2882 in 2014) and the undisputed king of chess throughout the 2010s. The Scotch Game, an opening famously revived by Kasparov in the 1990s, sets the stage for this clash between two positional giants in 2017.
Analyse this game →Model games
Real master games in this opening, reviewed at depth 25 — open one to study the eval graph, move classifications and key turning points.
Scotch Game
- Caruana, F.. (2820) – Aronian, L.. (2781) · 2021 · DrawAnalyse →
- Nakamura, Hi (2786) – Carlsen, M. (2832) · 2018 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- So, W. (2810) – Carlsen, M. (2822) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Italian Game: Classical Variation, Greco Gambit, Moeller-Therkatz Attack
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit, Max Lange Attack
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 5…Bb6
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 5…Bxd4
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 5…Nxd4
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 6…d6
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 7…d6
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4…Bc5, 7…O-O
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 4…Bb4+
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 4…Be7
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 5…d3
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 5…d6
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 7…Bxc3+
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 7…O-O
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 8…Nxc3
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 4.Bc4, 9…Ne5
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game — 5…Bc5
Scotch Game — 5.Nb3
Scotch Game — 7…O-O
Scotch Game — 8…O-O
Scotch Game: Classical Variation
- Khamrakulov, D. (2507) – Pang, Qi (2203) · 2023 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ludwig, John (2377) – Leyva Rivera, Y. (2414) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Harutyunian, T. (2511) – Pashikian, A. (2607) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Baldassare, Stefano (2428) – Löf, Sven (2341) · 2017 · DrawAnalyse →
- Zajic, Milan (2491) – Miljkovic, Mir1 (2490) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Belka, Wieland (2495) – Pineda, Juan José (2334) · 2016 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Fass, Robert N (2390) – Haraldsson, Haraldur (2399) · 2014 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Chekmasov, Sergey Ivanovich (2380) – Istomin, Aleksandr Vasilievi (2277) · 2013 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Van Damme, Liban (2232) – Markovich, Mikhail Zinovievich (2323) · 2012 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Lahno, Kateryna (2539) – Bok, Benjamin (2453) · 2010 · DrawAnalyse →
- Schulze, Torben (2211) – Bode, Wilfried (2352) · 2009 · DrawAnalyse →
- Kernazhitsky, Leonid (2373) – Moiseev, Igor (2217) · 2007 · DrawAnalyse →
- Amonatov, Farrukh (2564) – Shabanov, Yuri (2427) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- De Gleria, Francesco (2402) – Pieper Emden, Carsten (2310) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Zelcic, Robert (2514) – Fressinet, Laurent (2625) · 2006 · DrawAnalyse →
- Rasmussen, Erik (2287) – Jørgensen, Brian (2264) · 2005 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Andi, Peter (2206) – Horvath, Miklos (2264) · 2005 · DrawAnalyse →
- Babula, Vlastimil (2584) – Varga, Zoltan (2564) · 2004 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Ekstroem, Roland (2430) – Horn, Peter (2265) · 1995 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game: Haxo Gambit
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game: Lolli Variation
Scotch Game: Scotch Gambit (4.Bc4, 4…d6)
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
Scotch Game: Scotch Gambit (4.Bc4, 4…h6)
- Jones, G. (2702) – Bu Xiangzhi (2729) · 2019 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Oros, R. (2302) – Zubov, A UKR. (2604) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Vachier Lagrave, M. (2796) – Kramnik, V. (2808) · 2017 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Storkebaum, Dr. Karl-Heinrich (2279) – Glembek, Bohumír (2212) · 2016 · DrawAnalyse →
- Benend, Andreas (2227) – Tammert, Guenther (2210) · 2006 · White wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →
- Tiwari, Arjun (2318) – Najdoski, Toni (2548) · 2000 · Black wins (resignation, time or agreement)Analyse →